Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Tesla M10
When choosing between Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Tesla M10, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Tesla M10.
Tesla M10
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4850 here:
Main Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 7 GB more memory, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 533 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 4350 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 152% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 209% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. |
Full Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | Maxwell |
Code name | M98 | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 9 January 2009 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 850 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |