GRID K160Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Mobility Radeon HD 4870 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4870 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K160Q and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 - with Terascale 1.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 300 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 894 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in Fortnite is 91% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 466% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 1 |
| Code name | GK107 | M98-XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 9 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 22.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 880.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 56.83 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |