FirePro S9050 vs NVS 510

In this comparison between FirePro S9050 and NVS 510 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9050 will be the best choice, for others NVS 510 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

NVS 510 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	NVS 510
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 has 542% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and NVS 510 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9050 has 10 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and NVS 510 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 103 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
FirePro S9050 and NVS 510 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro S9050 is 94 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 3718 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	0−1
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	1−2
medium / 1080p	24−27	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	30−35	−
ultra / 1080p	27−30	−
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	0−1
medium / 1080p	35−40	−
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9050 and NVS 510 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	60−65
medium / 768p	200−210	27−30
ultra / 1080p	110−120	7−8
QHD / 1440p	85−90	−
4K / 2160p	45−50	−
high / 768p	160−170	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	50−55	0−1
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
FirePro S9050 and NVS 510 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	45−50
medium / 768p	100−110	10−11
ultra / 1080p	80−85	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 296% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	50−55	0−1
medium / 1080p	27−30	−
high / 1080p	30−35	−
ultra / 1080p	24−27	−
QHD / 1440p	14−16	−
low / 720p	120−130	21−24
medium / 1080p	70−75	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 468% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	30−35	0−1
ultra / 1080p	24−27	−
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	0−1
medium / 1080p	35−40	0−1
low / 768p	100−110	18−20
medium / 768p	90−95	−
high / 1080p	40−45	0−1
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	−
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	40−45	0−1
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
low / 768p	120−130	75−80
high / 1080p	−	27−30
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 62% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
low / 720p	70−75	8−9
medium / 1080p	18−20	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	−
QHD / 1440p	1−2	−
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	0−1
medium / 1080p	20−22	−
low / 768p	70−75	0−1
medium / 768p	45−50	−
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 768p	90−95	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	14−16
ultra / 1080p	40−45	0−1
high / 768p	55−60	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	NVS 510
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Tahiti	GK107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2014	23 October 2012
Pipelines	1792	192
Core clock speed	900 MHz	797 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	12.75
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	306.0 gflops
Length	254 mm	160 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	28.51 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		17 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs NVS 510

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares