GRID K520 vs NVS 510

In this comparison between GRID K520 and NVS 510 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K520 will be the best choice, for others NVS 510 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K520

NVS 510 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K520	NVS 510
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K520 has 542% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and NVS 510 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 and NVS 510 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 52 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
GRID K520 and NVS 510 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 107 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	0−1
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	30−35	1−2
medium / 1080p	20−22	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	55−60	0−1
medium / 1080p	27−30	−
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	210−220	60−65
medium / 768p	180−190	27−30
ultra / 1080p	100−110	7−8
QHD / 1440p	55−60	−
4K / 2160p	30−35	−
high / 768p	140−150	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	0−1
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	45−50
medium / 768p	95−100	10−11
ultra / 1080p	65−70	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	40−45	0−1
medium / 1080p	21−24	−
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	100−110	21−24
medium / 1080p	55−60	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 377% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	27−30	0−1
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	55−60	0−1
medium / 1080p	30−35	0−1
low / 768p	90−95	18−20
medium / 768p	80−85	−
high / 1080p	30−35	0−1
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	10−11	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	−
low / 720p	30−35	0−1
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
high / 1080p	−	27−30
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
low / 720p	60−65	8−9
medium / 1080p	24−27	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	30−35	0−1
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
low / 768p	60−65	0−1
medium / 768p	35−40	−
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 768p	100−110	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	14−16
ultra / 1080p	35−40	0−1
high / 768p	55−60	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 200% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	NVS 510
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK104	GK107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013	23 October 2012
Pipelines	1536	192
Core clock speed	745 MHz	797 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	12.75
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	306.0 gflops
Length	267 mm	160 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	28.51 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s	17 Mh/s
		Check Price

GRID K520 vs NVS 510

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares