Iris Graphics 550 vs NVS 510

In this comparison between Iris Graphics 550 and NVS 510 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 550 will be the best choice, for others NVS 510 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Iris Graphics 550 Check Price

NVS 510 Check Price

Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:

Iris Graphics 550 Laptops

Main Specs

	Iris Graphics 550	NVS 510
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	eDRAM	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
Iris Graphics 550 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and NVS 510 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Graphics 550 has 62 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Iris Graphics 550 is used in Laptops, and NVS 510 - in Desktops.
Iris Graphics 550 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and NVS 510 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 497 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and NVS 510 - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	9−10	0−1
ultra / 1080p	5−6	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	1−2
medium / 1080p	10−12	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	0−1
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 550.
low / 768p	160−170	60−65
medium / 768p	130−140	27−30
ultra / 1080p	65−70	7−8
QHD / 1440p	35−40	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
high / 768p	100−110	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	24−27	0−1
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 550.
low / 768p	90−95	45−50
medium / 768p	70−75	10−11
ultra / 1080p	40−45	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	10−12	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	24−27	0−1
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
low / 720p	70−75	21−24
medium / 1080p	30−35	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Fortnite is 227% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	16−18	0−1
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	0−1
medium / 1080p	18−20	0−1
low / 768p	60−65	18−20
medium / 768p	55−60	−
high / 1080p	18−20	0−1
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	4−5	−
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	18−20	0−1
medium / 1080p	8−9	−
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
high / 1080p	95−100	27−30
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Minecraft is 90% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
low / 720p	40−45	8−9
medium / 1080p	18−20	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	16−18	0−1
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
low / 768p	30−35	0−1
medium / 768p	21−24	−
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 768p	90−95	45−50
medium / 768p	50−55	14−16
ultra / 1080p	24−27	0−1
high / 768p	40−45	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	Iris Graphics 550	NVS 510
Architecture	Gen. 9 Skylake	Kepler
Code name	Skylake GT3e	GK107
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 September 2015	23 October 2012
Pipelines	48	192
Core clock speed	300 MHz	797 MHz
Boost Clock	1100 MHz
Transistor count	189 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	52.80	12.75
Floating-point performance		306.0 gflops
Length		160 mm
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth		28.51 GB/s
Shared memory	+
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.97	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		17 Mh/s
Quick Sync	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Iris Graphics 550 vs NVS 510

Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares