Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs NVS 510
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and NVS 510, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and NVS 510 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
NVS 510
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is used in Laptops, and NVS 510 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and NVS 510 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 497 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and NVS 510 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
1−2
medium / 1080p
16−18
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
200−210
60−65
medium / 768p
170−180
27−30
ultra / 1080p
90−95
7−8
QHD / 1440p
50−55
−
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
130−140
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
90−95
10−11
ultra / 1080p
60−65
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 237% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
90−95
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 318% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
24−27
0−1
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
24−27
0−1
low / 768p
80−85
18−20
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 720p
50−55
8−9
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 768p
50−55
0−1
medium / 768p
30−35
−
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 768p
100−105
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
high / 768p
50−55
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 188% more, than NVS 510.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
NVS 510
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Kepler
Code name
Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
GK107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
28 May 2019
23 October 2012
Pipelines
64
192
Core clock speed
300 MHz
797 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
12.75
Floating-point performance
306.0 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price