Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs NVS 510
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and NVS 510 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be the best choice, for others NVS 510 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
NVS 510
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
NVS 510 has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and NVS 510 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 62 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and NVS 510 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and NVS 510 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 447 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and NVS 510 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
1−2
medium / 1080p
12−14
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
170−180
60−65
medium / 768p
140−150
27−30
ultra / 1080p
70−75
7−8
QHD / 1440p
40−45
−
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
100−110
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 342% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
75−80
10−11
ultra / 1080p
45−50
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 193% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
10−12
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 720p
75−80
21−24
medium / 1080p
35−40
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 250% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
16−18
0−1
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
0−1
low / 768p
65−70
18−20
medium / 768p
55−60
−
high / 1080p
18−20
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 36% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
40−45
8−9
medium / 1080p
20−22
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
35−40
0−1
medium / 768p
21−24
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
high / 768p
40−45
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than NVS 510.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
NVS 510
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Kepler
Code name
Skylake GT4e
GK107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
23 October 2012
Pipelines
72
192
Core clock speed
350 MHz
797 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
75.60
12.75
Floating-point performance
306.0 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
