NVS 510 vs Quadro 3000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing NVS 510 and Quadro 3000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro 3000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
NVS 510
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 114% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
NVS 510 and Quadro 3000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 347 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of NVS 510 is 1157 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
6−7
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
120−130
medium / 768p
27−30
95−100
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
high / 768p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
70−75
65−70
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 113% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
10−12
medium / 1080p
−
4−5
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
8−9
low / 768p
18−20
45−50
high / 1080p
0−1
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
4−5
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
80−85
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 60% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than NVS 510.
low / 720p
0−1
6−7
low / 768p
0−1
10−11
medium / 768p
−
8−9
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
high / 768p
12−14
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 92% more, than NVS 510.
Full Specs
NVS 510
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi
Code name
GK107
Fermi
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 October 2012
22 February 2011
Pipelines
192
240
Core clock speed
797 MHz
450 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
12.75
18.00
Floating-point performance
306.0 gflops
432.0 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
3.0
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price