NVS 510 vs Quadro 4000

When comparing NVS 510 and Quadro 4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro 4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

• Quadro 4000 has 305% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
• Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
• NVS 510 and Quadro 4000 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
• Both cards are used in Desktops.
• NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 4000 - with Fermi.
• Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 322 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
• NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000 - by 40 nm process technology.
• Quadro 4000 is 81 mm longer, than NVS 510.
• Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000 is 1026 MHz higher, than NVS 510.