NVS 510 vs Quadro K1000M
In this comparison between NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 510 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
NVS 510
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K1000M has 28% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 53 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 18 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
1−2
medium / 1080p
0−1
0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
0−1
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 768p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
high / 768p
16−18
16−18
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
medium / 768p
10−11
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
low / 720p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
0−1
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
0−1
0−1
low / 768p
18−20
18−20
high / 1080p
0−1
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
12−14
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
low / 720p
0−1
0−1
low / 768p
75−80
75−80
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
low / 720p
8−9
8−9
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
low / 720p
0−1
0−1
low / 768p
0−1
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
medium / 768p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
high / 768p
12−14
12−14
NVS 510 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
NVS 510
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK107
N14P-Q1
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 October 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
192
192
Core clock speed
797 MHz
850 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
12.75
13.60
Floating-point performance
306.0 gflops
326.4 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
