NVS 510 vs Quadro K2000D

In this comparison between NVS 510 and Quadro K2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 510 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	51 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2000D has 45% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
NVS 510 and Quadro K2000D have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 and Quadro K2000D are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 157 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 and Quadro K2000D are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2000D is 42 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 2218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	60−65	140−150
medium / 768p	27−30	110−120
ultra / 1080p	7−8	55−60
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	16−18	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Dota 2 is 158% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Fortnite is 204% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	14−16
low / 768p	18−20	55−60
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Minecraft is 79% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	27−30
medium / 768p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in World of Tanks is 128% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K2000D
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	1 March 2013
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	797 MHz	954 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	30.53
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	732.7 gflops
Length	160 mm	202 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	31 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro K2000D

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares