NVS 510 vs Quadro K2000M

When choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro K2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 510 and Quadro K2000M.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro K2000M Check Price

Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:

Quadro K2000M Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	55 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2000M has 57% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
NVS 510 and Quadro K2000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 and Quadro K2000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 52 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
NVS 510 and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 18 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	1−2
ultra / 1080p	−	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	12−14
medium / 1080p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	−	5−6
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p	60−65	120−130
medium / 768p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	7−8	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	21−24
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
high / 768p	16−18	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	70−75
ultra / 1080p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	10−11	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Dota 2 is 106% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	2−3
ultra / 1080p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	10−12
medium / 1080p	−	3−4
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	0−1	8−9
low / 768p	18−20	40−45
high / 1080p	0−1	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	1−2
ultra / 1080p	−	0−1
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	5−6
medium / 1080p	−	3−4
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
high / 1080p	27−30	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 69% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 720p	8−9	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	6−7
low / 768p	0−1	12−14
medium / 768p	−	8−9
high / 1080p	−	4−5
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 768p	45−50	75−80
medium / 768p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	16−18
high / 768p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 96% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K2000M
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	N14P-Q3
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	1 June 2012
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	797 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	23.84
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	572.2 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	18 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Optimus		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro K2000M

Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares