NVS 510 vs Quadro M1000M

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro M1000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the NVS 510 stacks up against Quadro M1000M, check out specs charts below.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro M1000M Check Price

Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:

Quadro M1000M Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro M1000M
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	40 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB/4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M1000M has 14% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
NVS 510 and Quadro M1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 196 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 and Quadro M1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 3218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	30−35
medium / 1080p	0−1	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	−	27−30
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p	60−65	210−220
medium / 768p	27−30	180−190
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−105
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 475% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	95−100
ultra / 1080p	0−1	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 265% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	0−1	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 377% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
low / 720p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
low / 768p	18−20	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	30−33
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 720p	8−9	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 768p	0−1	55−60
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 192% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro M1000M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK107	GM107
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	2 October 2015
Pipelines	192	512
Core clock speed	797 MHz	993 MHz
Boost Clock		1072 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	31.78
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	1,017 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.22 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	140 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro M1000M

Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares