NVS 510 vs Quadro M2000

When comparing NVS 510 and Quadro M2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro M2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M2000 has 114% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 1 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
NVS 510 and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M2000 is 41 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 4830 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	1−2	40−45
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	230−240
medium / 768p	27−30	200−210
ultra / 1080p	7−8	120−130
QHD / 1440p	−	90−95
4K / 2160p	−	50−55
high / 768p	16−18	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 296% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	−	27−30
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	120−130
medium / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 468% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	0−1	70−75
medium / 1080p	0−1	40−45
low / 768p	18−20	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 62% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
low / 768p	0−1	75−80
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	40−45
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro M2000
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK107	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	8 April 2016
Pipelines	192	768
Core clock speed	797 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	55.82
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	160 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares