NVS 510 vs Quadro M2200

In this comparison between NVS 510 and Quadro M2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 510 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro M2200 Check Price

Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:

Quadro M2200 Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro M2200
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	55 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M2200 has 57% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 103 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
NVS 510 and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 3726 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	1−2	40−45
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	−	40−45
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	240−250
medium / 768p	27−30	210−220
ultra / 1080p	7−8	130−140
QHD / 1440p	−	100−110
4K / 2160p	−	55−60
high / 768p	16−18	180−190
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 596% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	21−24
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	130−140
medium / 1080p	0−1	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 513% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	30−33
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	0−1	40−45
low / 768p	18−20	110−120
medium / 768p	−	100−110
high / 1080p	0−1	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 62% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	75−80
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
low / 768p	0−1	85−90
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	40−45
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro M2200
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK107	N17P-Q3
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	13 January 2017
Pipelines	192	1024
Core clock speed	797 MHz	694 MHz
Boost Clock		1038 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5508 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	88 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
3D Stereo		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro M2200

Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares