NVS 510 vs Quadro M4000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro M4000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the NVS 510 stacks up against Quadro M4000M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
NVS 510
Quadro M4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M4000M has 185% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 178 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 3230 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
1−2
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
60−65
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
250−260
medium / 768p
27−30
220−230
ultra / 1080p
7−8
180−190
QHD / 1440p
−
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
16−18
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
NVS 510 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
120−130
medium / 768p
10−11
110−120
ultra / 1080p
0−1
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 313% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
0−1
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
21−24
180−190
medium / 1080p
0−1
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 740% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
0−1
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
low / 768p
18−20
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
0−1
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
75−80
130−140
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 75% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
0−1
130−140
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
50−55
high / 768p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 188% more, than NVS 510.
Full Specs
NVS 510
Quadro M4000M
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK107
GM204
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 October 2012
2 October 2015
Pipelines
192
1,280
Core clock speed
797 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
12.75
78.00
Floating-point performance
306.0 gflops
2,496 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
251 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price