NVS 510 vs Quadro P2000
When choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro P2000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 510 and Quadro P2000.
Main Specs
NVS 510
Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
5 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro P2000 has 114% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P2000 has 3 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 279 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Quadro P2000 is 41 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 5226 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
1−2
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
65−70
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro P2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
250−260
medium / 768p
27−30
220−230
ultra / 1080p
7−8
180−190
QHD / 1440p
−
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
16−18
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
NVS 510 and Quadro P2000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
120−130
medium / 768p
10−11
110−120
ultra / 1080p
0−1
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
0−1
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
21−24
180−190
medium / 1080p
0−1
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
0−1
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
0−1
110−120
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
low / 768p
18−20
140−150
medium / 768p
−
130−140
high / 1080p
0−1
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
24−27
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
0−1
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
75−80
130−140
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 75% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
0−1
130−140
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
−
50−55
ultra / 1080p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
55−60
high / 768p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than NVS 510.
Full Specs
NVS 510
Quadro P2000
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Code name
GK107
GP106
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
23 October 2012
6 February 2017
Pipelines
192
1024
Core clock speed
797 MHz
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
12.75
94.72
Floating-point performance
306.0 gflops
3,031 gflops
Length
160 mm
201 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
160 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
140.2 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.0
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price