NVS 510 vs Quadro T1000

When comparing NVS 510 and Quadro T1000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro T1000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro T1000

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro T1000
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

Quadro T1000 has 42% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 598 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	1−2	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	0−1	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	60−65
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	250−260
medium / 768p	27−30	220−230
ultra / 1080p	7−8	180−190
QHD / 1440p	−	110−120
4K / 2160p	−	70−75
high / 768p	16−18	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	0−1	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	21−24	180−190
medium / 1080p	0−1	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	0−1	100−110
medium / 1080p	0−1	65−70
low / 768p	18−20	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	0−1	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	75−80	130−140
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 75% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	0−1	130−140
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	−	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	50−55
high / 768p	12−14	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro T1000
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Code name	GK107	TU117
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	27 May 2019
Pipelines	192
Core clock speed	797 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost Clock		1455 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s
	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro T1000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares