Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    NVS 510 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

    When comparing NVS 510 and Quadro T2000 Max Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro T2000 Max Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    NVS 510 Check Price
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Check Price

    Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:

    Quadro T2000 Max Q Laptops

    Main Specs

      NVS 510 Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 40 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro T2000 Max Q has 14% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
    • NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro T2000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
    • NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
    • NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 133 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
    • NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 6218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 0−1 35−40
    ultra / 1080p − 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 1−2 60−65
    medium / 1080p 0−1 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than NVS 510.

    Full Specs

      NVS 510 Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Architecture Kepler Turing
    Code name GK107 N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 23 October 2012 27 May 2019
    Pipelines 192 1024
    Core clock speed 797 MHz 930 / 1200 MHz
    Boost Clock 1500 / 1620 MHz
    Transistor count 1,270 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 12.75 103.7
    Floating-point performance 306.0 gflops
    Length 160 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1782 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
    CUDA 3.0 7.5
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 17 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares