NVS 510 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

In this comparison between NVS 510 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 510 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 510 Check Price

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Check Price

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 85% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 285 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	1−2	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p	60−65	190−200
medium / 768p	27−30	160−170
ultra / 1080p	7−8	85−90
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	10−11	85−90
ultra / 1080p	0−1	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	90−95
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 318% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
low / 768p	18−20	75−80
medium / 768p	−	65−70
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−105
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 36% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 720p	8−9	50−55
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	45−50
medium / 768p	−	27−30
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	14−16	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Architecture	Kepler	Polaris
Code name	GK107	Polaris 12
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	26 September 2019
Pipelines	192	640
Core clock speed	797 MHz	1082 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	41.44
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares