NVS 510 vs Radeon R7 250

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between NVS 510 and Radeon R7 250, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the NVS 510 stacks up against Radeon R7 250, check out specs charts below.

NVS 510 Check Price

Radeon R7 250 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	N/A
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 250 has 114% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
NVS 510 and Radeon R7 250 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
NVS 510 and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Radeon R7 250 is 8 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of NVS 510 is 632 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	3−4
ultra / 1080p	−	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	14−16
medium / 1080p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	60−65	120−130
medium / 768p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	7−8	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
high / 768p	16−18	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	45−50	80−85
medium / 768p	10−11	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	4−5
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	5−6
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Fortnite is 136% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	0−1	10−11
low / 768p	18−20	45−50
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	0−1	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	2−3
ultra / 1080p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	9−10
medium / 1080p	−	4−5
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
high / 1080p	27−30	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Minecraft is 69% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 720p	8−9	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	7−8
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	0−1	18−20
medium / 768p	−	12−14
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	16−18
high / 768p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon R7 250
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Code name	GK107	Oland XT
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 October 2012	1 October 2013
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	797 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	25.20
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	716.8 gflops
Length	160 mm	168 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	117 Mh/s
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Radeon R7 250

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares