NVS 510 vs Radeon R9 M275

In this comparison between NVS 510 and Radeon R9 M275 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 510 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M275 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 510 Check Price

Radeon R9 M275 Check Price

Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:

Radeon R9 M275 Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon R9 M275
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M275 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 M275 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 128 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 2718 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	12−14
medium / 1080p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	−	5−6
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
NVS 510 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	110−120
medium / 768p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	7−8	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
high / 768p	16−18	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 182% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	10−11	50−55
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	10−12
medium / 1080p	−	3−4
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Fortnite is 136% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	7−8
low / 768p	18−20	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	3−4
ultra / 1080p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	7−8
medium / 1080p	−	4−5
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
high / 1080p	27−30	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Minecraft is 50% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 720p	8−9	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	8−9
low / 768p	0−1	16−18
medium / 768p	−	12−14
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	14−16
high / 768p	12−14	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon R9 M275
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Code name	GK107	Venus
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	23 October 2012	1 August 2014
Pipelines	192	640
Core clock speed	797 MHz	925 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	37.00
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	1,184 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	122 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Radeon R9 M275

Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares