NVS 510 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When comparing NVS 510 and Radeon RX Vega M GL, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 510 and Radeon RX Vega M GL is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
NVS 510
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 85% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 134 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of NVS 510 is 382 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
1−2
35−40
medium / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
60−65
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
60−65
220−230
medium / 768p
27−30
190−200
ultra / 1080p
7−8
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
16−18
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
NVS 510 and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
110−120
medium / 768p
10−11
100−110
ultra / 1080p
0−1
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 279% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
110−120
medium / 1080p
0−1
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 422% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
0−1
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
0−1
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
low / 768p
18−20
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 768p
0−1
60−65
medium / 768p
−
40−45
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 180% more, than NVS 510.
Full Specs
NVS 510
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Code name
GK107
Polaris 22
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
23 October 2012
1 February 2018
Pipelines
192
1280
Core clock speed
797 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
12.75
80.88
Floating-point performance
306.0 gflops
2,588 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price