NVS 510 vs Tesla C2050

When choosing between NVS 510 and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 510 and Tesla C2050.

NVS 510 Check Price

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price

Tesla C2050 has 580% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 223 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 88 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	60−65	220−230
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	110−120
QHD / 1440p	−	70−75
4K / 2160p	−	35−40
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 514% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 422% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	35−40
low / 768p	18−20	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	65−70
medium / 768p	−	40−45
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Tesla C2050
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK107	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	25 July 2011
Pipelines	192	448
Core clock speed	797 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	32.14
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	160 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	90 Mh/s
	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares