FirePro S9000 vs NVS 810

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and NVS 810, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against NVS 810, check out specs charts below.

FirePro S9000

NVS 810 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	8x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 has 414% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 2 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
FirePro S9000 and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro S9000 is 69 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3700 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	2−3
ultra / 1080p	21−24	1−2
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	12−14
medium / 1080p	40−45	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	5−6
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	16−18
medium / 1080p	60−65	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9000 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	120−130
medium / 768p	220−230	95−100
ultra / 1080p	180−190	40−45
QHD / 1440p	110−120	21−24
4K / 2160p	70−75	16−18
high / 768p	210−220	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	60−65	65−70
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	120−130	80−85
medium / 768p	110−120	45−50
ultra / 1080p	100−110	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	45−50	2−3
ultra / 1080p	40−45	2−3
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	2−3
low / 720p	80−85	10−12
medium / 1080p	45−50	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	60−65	10−11
ultra / 1080p	45−50	5−6
QHD / 1440p	27−30	4−5
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	50−55
medium / 1080p	110−120	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	60−65	5−6
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	30−35	3−4
4K / 2160p	24−27	2−3
low / 720p	100−110	18−20
medium / 1080p	65−70	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	140−150	45−50
medium / 768p	120−130	−
high / 1080p	70−75	4−5
ultra / 1080p	30−35	2−3
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	2−3
ultra / 1080p	20−22	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	4−5
medium / 1080p	30−35	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	130−140	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	120−130	85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 44% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	6−7
medium / 1080p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	130−140	10−11
medium / 768p	85−90	8−9
high / 1080p	45−50	4−5
ultra / 1080p	24−27	4−5
4K / 2160p	16−18	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	50−55	14−16
high / 768p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	NVS 810
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Tahiti	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	4 November 2015
Pipelines	1792	512
Core clock speed	900 MHz	902 MHz
Boost Clock		1033 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	33.06
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	2x 1,058 gflops
Length	267 mm	198 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 vs NVS 810

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares