FirePro S9050 vs NVS 810

In this comparison between FirePro S9050 and NVS 810 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9050 will be the best choice, for others NVS 810 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

NVS 810 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	8x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 has 230% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S9050 has 10 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 2 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.
FirePro S9050 and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro S9050 is 56 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 3700 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	2−3
ultra / 1080p	12−14	1−2
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	12−14
medium / 1080p	24−27	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	30−35	−
ultra / 1080p	27−30	5−6
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	16−18
medium / 1080p	35−40	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9050 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	120−130
medium / 768p	200−210	95−100
ultra / 1080p	110−120	40−45
QHD / 1440p	85−90	21−24
4K / 2160p	45−50	16−18
high / 768p	160−170	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	60−65	65−70
ultra / 1080p	50−55	20−22
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	120−130	80−85
medium / 768p	100−110	45−50
ultra / 1080p	80−85	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 108% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	2−3
ultra / 1080p	21−24	2−3
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	2−3
low / 720p	50−55	10−12
medium / 1080p	27−30	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	30−35	10−11
ultra / 1080p	24−27	5−6
QHD / 1440p	14−16	4−5
low / 720p	120−130	50−55
medium / 1080p	70−75	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 237% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	30−35	5−6
ultra / 1080p	24−27	−
QHD / 1440p	12−14	3−4
4K / 2160p	12−14	2−3
low / 720p	65−70	18−20
medium / 1080p	35−40	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	100−110	45−50
medium / 768p	90−95	−
high / 1080p	40−45	4−5
ultra / 1080p	16−18	2−3
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	10−11	0−1
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	4−5
medium / 1080p	16−18	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	120−130	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	110−120	85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 33% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	70−75	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	−
QHD / 1440p	1−2	−
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	6−7
medium / 1080p	20−22	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	10−11
medium / 768p	45−50	8−9
high / 1080p	24−27	4−5
ultra / 1080p	14−16	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	40−45	14−16
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	NVS 810
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Tahiti	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2014	4 November 2015
Pipelines	1792	512
Core clock speed	900 MHz	902 MHz
Boost Clock		1033 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	33.06
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	2x 1,058 gflops
Length	254 mm	198 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Form factor	full height / full length
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs NVS 810

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares