FirePro W9000 vs NVS 810

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W9000 and NVS 810. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W9000 and NVS 810. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro W9000 Check Price

NVS 810 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W9000	NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI	8x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W9000 has 414% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W9000 has 4 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 73 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
FirePro W9000 and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro W9000 is 81 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 3700 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	2−3
ultra / 1080p	21−24	1−2
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	12−14
medium / 1080p	40−45	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	5−6
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	16−18
medium / 1080p	60−65	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W9000 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	120−130
medium / 768p	220−230	95−100
ultra / 1080p	180−190	40−45
QHD / 1440p	110−120	21−24
4K / 2160p	70−75	16−18
high / 768p	210−220	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	60−65	65−70
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	120−130	80−85
medium / 768p	110−120	45−50
ultra / 1080p	100−110	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	45−50	2−3
ultra / 1080p	40−45	2−3
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	2−3
low / 720p	80−85	10−12
medium / 1080p	45−50	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	60−65	10−11
ultra / 1080p	45−50	5−6
QHD / 1440p	27−30	4−5
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	50−55
medium / 1080p	110−120	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	60−65	5−6
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	30−35	3−4
4K / 2160p	24−27	2−3
low / 720p	100−110	18−20
medium / 1080p	65−70	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	140−150	45−50
medium / 768p	120−130	−
high / 1080p	70−75	4−5
ultra / 1080p	30−35	2−3
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	2−3
ultra / 1080p	20−22	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	4−5
medium / 1080p	30−35	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	130−140	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	120−130	85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 44% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	6−7
medium / 1080p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	130−140	10−11
medium / 768p	85−90	8−9
high / 1080p	45−50	4−5
ultra / 1080p	24−27	4−5
4K / 2160p	16−18	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	50−55	14−16
high / 768p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	FirePro W9000	NVS 810
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Tahiti	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	14 June 2012	4 November 2015
Pipelines	2048	512
Core clock speed	975 MHz	902 MHz
Boost Clock		1033 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	124.8	33.06
Floating-point performance	3,994 gflops	2x 1,058 gflops
Length	279 mm	198 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	460 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W9000 vs NVS 810

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares