FireStream 9250 vs NVS 810
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and NVS 810, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and NVS 810.
FireStream 9250
Main Specs
FireStream 9250
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
FireStream 9250 has 120% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and NVS 810 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
NVS 810 has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 277 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and NVS 810 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 186 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
1−2
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
4−5
FireStream 9250 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
95−100
ultra / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
21−24
4K / 2160p
18−20
16−18
high / 768p
70−75
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
80−85
65−70
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
75−80
80−85
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
10−12
medium / 1080p
4−5
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−12
10−11
ultra / 1080p
6−7
5−6
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 6% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
8−9
5−6
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
20−22
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−11
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
8−9
4−5
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
4−5
medium / 1080p
4−5
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
85−90
80−85
ultra / 1080p
85−90
70−75
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
85−90
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 6% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
FireStream 9250 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
6−7
medium / 1080p
7−8
−
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
16−18
10−11
medium / 768p
12−14
8−9
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
80−85
70−75
medium / 768p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
FireStream 9250
NVS 810
Architecture
TeraScale
Maxwell
Code name
RV770
GM107
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
16 June 2008
4 November 2015
Pipelines
800
512
Core clock speed
625 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
956 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
25.00
33.06
Floating-point performance
1,000.0 gflops
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1986 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
63.55 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.1
5.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Check Price
