GeForce GTX 275 vs NVS 810
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and NVS 810, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 275 stacks up against NVS 810, check out specs charts below.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 222% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and NVS 810 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 894 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 502 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and NVS 810 - by 28 nm process technology.
NVS 810 is 188 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 275.
Memory clock speed of NVS 810 is 666 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
2−3
ultra / 1080p
4−5
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
8−9
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−12
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
12−14
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 275 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
95−100
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
QHD / 1440p
27−30
21−24
4K / 2160p
27−30
16−18
high / 768p
75−80
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
80−85
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
8−9
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
2−3
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
10−12
medium / 1080p
8−9
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
60−65
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Fortnite is 42% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
6−7
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
4−5
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
4−5
medium / 1080p
6−7
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
high / 1080p
85−90
80−85
ultra / 1080p
80−85
70−75
medium / 1080p
90−95
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Minecraft is 6% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
10−12
6−7
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
24−27
10−11
medium / 768p
16−18
8−9
high / 1080p
9−10
4−5
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
85−90
70−75
medium / 768p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
high / 768p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
NVS 810
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Maxwell
Code name
GT200B
GM107
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
15 January 2009
4 November 2015
Pipelines
240
512
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
33.06
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
198 mm
Memory bus width
448 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.0
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Check Price
Check Price
