GRID K160Q vs NVS 810
When comparing GRID K160Q and NVS 810, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and NVS 810 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
GRID K160Q
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
130 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K160Q has 91% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
NVS 810 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 52 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
GRID K160Q and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of NVS 810 is 18 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
9−10
12−14
medium / 1080p
1−2
4−5
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p
1−2
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
16−18
medium / 1080p
2−3
6−7
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
75−80
95−100
ultra / 1080p
30−35
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
9−10
16−18
high / 768p
50−55
65−70
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
70−75
65−70
ultra / 1080p
10−12
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
65−70
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
0−1
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
6−7
10−12
medium / 1080p
1−2
4−5
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
3−4
10−12
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Fortnite is 34% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
10−12
18−20
medium / 1080p
3−4
8−9
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
35−40
45−50
high / 1080p
0−1
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
0−1
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
4−5
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
50−55
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
85−90
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Minecraft is 24% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q.
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
1−2
6−7
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
3−4
10−11
medium / 768p
−
8−9
high / 1080p
2−3
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
high / 768p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K160Q.
Full Specs
GRID K160Q
NVS 810
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK107
GM107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
28 June 2013
4 November 2015
Pipelines
192
512
Core clock speed
850 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
13.60
33.06
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Check Price
