GRID K220Q vs NVS 810
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and NVS 810 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others NVS 810 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Main Specs
GRID K220Q
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K220Q has 230% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 157 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
GRID K220Q and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 3200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
12−14
medium / 1080p
2−3
4−5
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K220Q.
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
16−18
medium / 1080p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
95−100
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
10−11
16−18
high / 768p
60−65
65−70
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
70−75
65−70
ultra / 1080p
14−16
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
GRID K220Q and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
70−75
80−85
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Dota 2 is 13% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
9−10
10−12
medium / 1080p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
45−50
50−55
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−12
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Fortnite is 20% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
3−4
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
18−20
medium / 1080p
5−6
8−9
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
40−45
45−50
high / 1080p
3−4
4−5
ultra / 1080p
2−3
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
35−40
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
1−2
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
3−4
4−5
medium / 1080p
2−3
3−4
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
55−60
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
85−90
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GRID K220Q.
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
7−8
10−11
medium / 768p
6−7
8−9
high / 1080p
3−4
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
high / 768p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GRID K220Q.
Full Specs
GRID K220Q
NVS 810
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK104
GM107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
2 July 2014
4 November 2015
Pipelines
1536
512
Core clock speed
745 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
33.06
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Check Price
