GRID K240Q vs NVS 810
When comparing GRID K240Q and NVS 810, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and NVS 810 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
GRID K240Q
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K240Q has 230% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
NVS 810 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 157 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
2−3
ultra / 1080p
6−7
1−2
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
12−14
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
18−20
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
170−180
120−130
medium / 768p
140−150
95−100
ultra / 1080p
75−80
40−45
QHD / 1440p
40−45
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
16−18
high / 768p
110−120
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
27−30
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
95−100
80−85
medium / 768p
75−80
45−50
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 48% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
12−14
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−12
2−3
4K / 2160p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
10−12
medium / 1080p
12−14
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
18−20
10−11
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
75−80
50−55
medium / 1080p
35−40
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 94% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
18−20
5−6
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
21−24
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
−
high / 1080p
20−22
4−5
ultra / 1080p
9−10
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
7−8
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
4−5
medium / 1080p
9−10
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
90−95
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−105
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 19% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
20−22
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
35−40
10−11
medium / 768p
24−27
8−9
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
14−16
high / 768p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
GRID K240Q
NVS 810
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK104
GM107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
28 June 2013
4 November 2015
Pipelines
1536
512
Core clock speed
745 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
33.06
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Check Price