GRID K260Q vs NVS 810

When comparing GRID K260Q and NVS 810, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and NVS 810 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K260Q

NVS 810 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	8x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K260Q has 230% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K260Q and NVS 810 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 157 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	1−2
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	16−18
medium / 1080p	27−30	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	95−100
ultra / 1080p	95−100	40−45
QHD / 1440p	50−55	21−24
4K / 2160p	30−33	16−18
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	40−45	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	110−120	80−85
medium / 768p	90−95	45−50
ultra / 1080p	60−65	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 80% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	18−20	2−3
ultra / 1080p	16−18	2−3
4K / 2160p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	10−12
medium / 1080p	18−20	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	95−100	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	5−6
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	30−33	4−5
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	4−5
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	6−7
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	55−60	10−11
medium / 768p	30−35	8−9
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	10−12	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	14−16
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	NVS 810
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	4 November 2015
Pipelines	1536	512
Core clock speed	745 MHz	902 MHz
Boost Clock		1033 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	33.06
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	2x 1,058 gflops
Length		198 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs NVS 810

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares