GRID M10 8Q vs NVS 810
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M10 8Q and NVS 810, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M10 8Q stacks up against NVS 810, check out specs charts below.
GRID M10 8Q
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID M10 8Q has 230% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID M10 8Q and NVS 810 are build with Maxwell architecture.
Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 131 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
GRID M10 8Q and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
GRID M10 8Q is 69 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3400 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
2−3
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
12−14
medium / 1080p
16−18
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
45−50
16−18
medium / 1080p
21−24
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p
190−200
120−130
medium / 768p
160−170
95−100
ultra / 1080p
85−90
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
16−18
high / 768p
120−130
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
35−40
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
100−110
80−85
medium / 768p
85−90
45−50
ultra / 1080p
55−60
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 66% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
14−16
2−3
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
4K / 2160p
5−6
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
10−12
medium / 1080p
16−18
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
10−11
ultra / 1080p
16−18
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
90−95
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 143% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
5−6
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
7−8
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
45−50
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
75−80
45−50
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
24−27
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−12
2−3
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
8−9
2−3
ultra / 1080p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
4−5
medium / 1080p
10−12
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
24−27
6−7
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
10−11
medium / 768p
30−33
8−9
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
95−100
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q
NVS 810
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Code name
GM107
GM107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
18 May 2016
4 November 2015
Pipelines
640
512
Core clock speed
1033 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.24
33.06
Floating-point performance
1,672 gflops
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
267 mm
198 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5200 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
5.0
Check Price
