GRID M6 8Q vs NVS 810
In this comparison between GRID M6 8Q and NVS 810 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M6 8Q will be the best choice, for others NVS 810 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID M6 8Q has 47% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 180 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
GRID M6 8Q and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 3212 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
18−20
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−11
1−2
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
21−24
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
24−27
5−6
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
16−18
medium / 1080p
30−35
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GRID M6 8Q and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
220−230
120−130
medium / 768p
190−200
95−100
ultra / 1080p
110−120
40−45
QHD / 1440p
75−80
21−24
4K / 2160p
40−45
16−18
high / 768p
160−170
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 119% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
ultra / 1080p
45−50
20−22
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
110−120
80−85
medium / 768p
100−110
45−50
ultra / 1080p
75−80
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 98% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
2−3
ultra / 1080p
20−22
2−3
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
2−3
low / 720p
45−50
10−12
medium / 1080p
24−27
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
27−30
10−11
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
14−16
4−5
low / 720p
110−120
50−55
medium / 1080p
65−70
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
30−35
5−6
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
10−12
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
60−65
18−20
medium / 1080p
35−40
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
95−100
45−50
medium / 768p
85−90
−
high / 1080p
35−40
4−5
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−12
2−3
ultra / 1080p
9−10
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
4−5
medium / 1080p
16−18
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 27% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
35−40
6−7
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
10−11
medium / 768p
40−45
8−9
high / 1080p
21−24
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 58% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q
NVS 810
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Maxwell
Code name
GM204
GM107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
30 August 2015
4 November 2015
Pipelines
1536
512
Core clock speed
722 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
69.31
33.06
Floating-point performance
2,218 gflops
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.4 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
5.2
5.0
Check Price
