Iris Graphics 6100 vs NVS 810
When comparing Iris Graphics 6100 and NVS 810, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and NVS 810 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 6100
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
System Shared
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
NVS 810 has 353% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and NVS 810 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and NVS 810 - in Desktops.
Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 602 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and NVS 810 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Graphics 6100 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
95−100
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
high / 768p
60−65
65−70
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
14−16
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
70−75
80−85
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
high / 1080p
6−7
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
10−12
medium / 1080p
6−7
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 15% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
9−10
5−6
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−11
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
40−45
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
8−9
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
Iris Graphics 6100 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
4−5
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
high / 1080p
80−85
80−85
ultra / 1080p
70−75
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
85−90
Iris Graphics 6100 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
18−20
10−11
medium / 768p
12−14
8−9
high / 1080p
7−8
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
80−85
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 6100
NVS 810
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Maxwell
Code name
Broadwell GT3
GM107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
5 January 2015
4 November 2015
Pipelines
48
512
Core clock speed
300 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1033 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
33.06
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
