Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVS 810
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVS 810 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be the best choice, for others NVS 810 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
NVS 810 has 353% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and NVS 810 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and NVS 810 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 602 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and NVS 810 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
1−2
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
12−14
medium / 1080p
16−18
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
16−18
medium / 1080p
21−24
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
190−200
120−130
medium / 768p
160−170
95−100
ultra / 1080p
85−90
40−45
QHD / 1440p
45−50
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
16−18
high / 768p
120−130
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
35−40
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
100−110
80−85
medium / 768p
85−90
45−50
ultra / 1080p
55−60
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
14−16
2−3
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
4K / 2160p
5−6
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
10−12
medium / 1080p
16−18
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
10−11
ultra / 1080p
16−18
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
85−90
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 137% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
5−6
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
7−8
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
45−50
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
75−80
45−50
medium / 768p
65−70
−
high / 1080p
24−27
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−11
2−3
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
8−9
2−3
ultra / 1080p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
4−5
medium / 1080p
10−12
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
95−100
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 21% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
24−27
6−7
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
10−11
medium / 768p
27−30
8−9
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
95−100
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVS 810
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Maxwell
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GM107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 September 2017
4 November 2015
Pipelines
48
512
Core clock speed
300 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1033 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
33.06
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
