NVS 810 vs Quadro 4000
In this comparison between NVS 810 and Quadro 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Main Specs
NVS 810
Quadro 4000
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
142 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
8x mini-DisplayPort
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 4000 has 108% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
NVS 810 and Quadro 4000 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro 4000 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 427 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
NVS 810 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Quadro 4000 is 43 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000 is 1008 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
6−7
ultra / 1080p
1−2
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
16−18
medium / 1080p
4−5
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
24−27
medium / 1080p
6−7
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
NVS 810 and Quadro 4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
130−140
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
21−24
27−30
4K / 2160p
16−18
27−30
high / 768p
65−70
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
80−85
80−85
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
8−9
ultra / 1080p
2−3
7−8
4K / 2160p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
10−12
18−20
medium / 1080p
4−5
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Fortnite is 42% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
5−6
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
1−2
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
medium / 768p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
4−5
12−14
ultra / 1080p
2−3
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
5−6
ultra / 1080p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
12−14
medium / 1080p
3−4
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
high / 1080p
80−85
90−95
ultra / 1080p
70−75
80−85
medium / 1080p
85−90
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
12−14
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
10−11
24−27
medium / 768p
8−9
16−18
high / 1080p
4−5
9−10
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
70−75
85−90
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
high / 768p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
NVS 810
Quadro 4000
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi
Code name
GM107
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
4 November 2015
2 November 2010
Pipelines
512
256
Core clock speed
902 MHz
475 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
33.06
15.20
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
486.4 gflops
Length
198 mm
241 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
2808 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
89.86 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
5.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
44 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
