NVS 810 vs Quadro K4000M
When choosing between NVS 810 and Quadro K4000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 810 and Quadro K4000M.
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
NVS 810
Quadro K4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
8x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4000M has 47% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K4000M has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 302 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
NVS 810 and Quadro K4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 1000 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
1−2
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
4−5
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
120−130
170−180
medium / 768p
95−100
140−150
ultra / 1080p
40−45
70−75
QHD / 1440p
21−24
40−45
4K / 2160p
16−18
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
80−85
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
75−80
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 48% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−12
4K / 2160p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
10−12
27−30
medium / 1080p
4−5
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−11
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
50−55
75−80
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 94% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
5−6
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
65−70
medium / 768p
−
60−65
high / 1080p
4−5
20−22
ultra / 1080p
2−3
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
7−8
ultra / 1080p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
4−5
20−22
medium / 1080p
3−4
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
90−95
medium / 1080p
85−90
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 16% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
10−11
35−40
medium / 768p
8−9
24−27
high / 1080p
4−5
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
high / 768p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
NVS 810
Quadro K4000M
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Code name
GM107
N14E-Q3
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
4 November 2015
1 June 2012
Pipelines
512
960
Core clock speed
902 MHz
600 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
33.06
48.08
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
1,154 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
37 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
