NVS 810 vs Quadro K4200

In this comparison between NVS 810 and Quadro K4200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 810 Check Price

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4200 has 58% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K4200 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 131 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
NVS 810 and Quadro K4200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K4200 is 43 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 3600 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	1−2	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	5−6	30−33
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	16−18	70−75
medium / 1080p	6−7	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 422% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 810 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	230−240
medium / 768p	95−100	200−210
ultra / 1080p	40−45	120−130
QHD / 1440p	21−24	100−105
4K / 2160p	16−18	55−60
high / 768p	65−70	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	45−50	110−120
ultra / 1080p	21−24	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 114% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	10−12	55−60
medium / 1080p	4−5	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	35−40
ultra / 1080p	5−6	27−30
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	130−140
medium / 1080p	10−12	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 268% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	14−16
low / 720p	18−20	70−75
medium / 1080p	8−9	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	4−5	40−45
ultra / 1080p	2−3	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 205% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	4−5	40−45
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 33% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	75−80
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	6−7	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	80−85
medium / 768p	8−9	50−55
high / 1080p	4−5	27−30
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	1−2	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 640% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro K4200
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 November 2015	22 July 2014
Pipelines	512	1344
Core clock speed	902 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	784 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	87.81
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	198 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		119 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares