NVS 810 vs Quadro K5200

In this comparison between NVS 810 and Quadro K5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 810 Check Price

Quadro K5200 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro K5200
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K5200 has 120% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K5200 has 6 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K5200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 235 MHz higher, than Quadro K5200.
NVS 810 and Quadro K5200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K5200 is 69 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 4208 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	35−40
ultra / 1080p	1−2	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	12−14	60−65
medium / 1080p	4−5	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	16−18	100−110
medium / 1080p	6−7	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 810 and Quadro K5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	250−260
medium / 768p	95−100	220−230
ultra / 1080p	40−45	180−190
QHD / 1440p	21−24	110−120
4K / 2160p	16−18	70−75
high / 768p	65−70	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	45−50	110−120
ultra / 1080p	21−24	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	45−50
ultra / 1080p	2−3	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	2−3	14−16
low / 720p	10−12	80−85
medium / 1080p	4−5	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
QHD / 1440p	4−5	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	50−55	180−190
medium / 1080p	10−12	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 443% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	3−4	30−35
4K / 2160p	2−3	24−27
low / 720p	18−20	100−110
medium / 1080p	8−9	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	4−5	70−75
ultra / 1080p	2−3	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	4−5	65−70
medium / 1080p	3−4	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	130−140
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 44% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	6−7	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	130−140
medium / 768p	8−9	85−90
high / 1080p	4−5	45−50
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
4K / 2160p	1−2	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	50−55
high / 768p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro K5200
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK110B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 November 2015	22 July 2014
Pipelines	512	2304
Core clock speed	902 MHz	667 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	771 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	148.0
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	3,553 gflops
Length	198 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	3.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		226 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Quadro K5200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares