NVS 810 vs Quadro K620

In this comparison between NVS 810 and Quadro K620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 810 Check Price

Quadro K620 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	41 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 has 65% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
NVS 810 and Quadro K620 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 and Quadro K620 are build with Maxwell architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 156 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 and Quadro K620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
NVS 810 is 38 mm longer, than Quadro K620.
Memory clock speed of NVS 810 and Quadro K620 is 1800 MHz.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	10−12
ultra / 1080p	1−2	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	24−27
medium / 1080p	4−5	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	5−6	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	16−18	40−45
medium / 1080p	6−7	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Battlefield 5 is 188% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	120−130	180−190
medium / 768p	95−100	150−160
ultra / 1080p	40−45	75−80
QHD / 1440p	21−24	45−50
4K / 2160p	16−18	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
NVS 810 and Quadro K620 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	80−85	95−100
medium / 768p	45−50	80−85
ultra / 1080p	21−24	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Dota 2 is 54% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
4K / 2160p	2−3	5−6
low / 720p	10−12	30−33
medium / 1080p	4−5	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	20−22
ultra / 1080p	5−6	14−16
QHD / 1440p	4−5	−
low / 720p	50−55	80−85
medium / 1080p	10−12	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Fortnite is 110% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	3−4	5−6
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	8−9	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	7−8
ultra / 1080p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	4−5	21−24
medium / 1080p	3−4	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	95−100
medium / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Minecraft is 21% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	27−30	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	40−45
medium / 768p	8−9	24−27
high / 1080p	4−5	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	95−100
medium / 768p	35−40	55−60
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
high / 768p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro K620
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM107	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 November 2015	22 July 2014
Pipelines	512	384
Core clock speed	902 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	26.98
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length	198 mm	160 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	5.0	5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		104 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Quadro K620

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares