NVS 810 vs Quadro P2000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing NVS 810 and Quadro P2000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between NVS 810 and Quadro P2000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Main Specs
NVS 810
Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
5 GB
Display Connectors
8x mini-DisplayPort
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro P2000 has 10% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro P2000 has 3 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 174 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Quadro P2000 is 3 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 5208 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
35−40
ultra / 1080p
1−2
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
4−5
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 760% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
6−7
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 733% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
NVS 810 and Quadro P2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
40−45
180−190
QHD / 1440p
21−24
110−120
4K / 2160p
16−18
70−75
high / 768p
65−70
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
21−24
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
45−50
ultra / 1080p
2−3
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
10−12
80−85
medium / 1080p
4−5
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 1100% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−11
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
50−55
QHD / 1440p
4−5
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
10−12
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 456% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
5−6
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
30−35
4K / 2160p
2−3
24−27
low / 720p
18−20
110−120
medium / 1080p
8−9
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 757% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
−
130−140
high / 1080p
4−5
70−75
ultra / 1080p
2−3
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
24−27
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
9−10
low / 720p
4−5
70−75
medium / 1080p
3−4
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
130−140
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
85−90
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 44% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
6−7
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1100% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
10−11
130−140
medium / 768p
8−9
85−90
high / 1080p
4−5
50−55
ultra / 1080p
4−5
27−30
4K / 2160p
1−2
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1180% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
55−60
high / 768p
30−35
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
NVS 810
Quadro P2000
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Code name
GM107
GP106
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
4 November 2015
6 February 2017
Pipelines
512
1024
Core clock speed
902 MHz
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1480 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
33.06
94.72
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
3,031 gflops
Length
198 mm
201 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
160 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
140.2 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
5.0
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
Check Price
Check Price