NVS 810 vs Quadro P600

In this comparison between NVS 810 and Quadro P600 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P600 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 810 Check Price

Quadro P600 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro P600
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	40 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 has 70% more power consumption, than Quadro P600.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
NVS 810 and Quadro P600 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro P600 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P600 is 528 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P600 - by 14 nm process technology.
NVS 810 is 53 mm longer, than Quadro P600.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P600 is 3212 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 320% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	6−7	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	120−130	220−230
medium / 768p	95−100	190−200
ultra / 1080p	40−45	100−110
QHD / 1440p	21−24	70−75
4K / 2160p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	65−70	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	100−110
ultra / 1080p	21−24	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	2−3	6−7
low / 720p	10−12	45−50
medium / 1080p	4−5	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	10−12	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Fortnite is 200% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	60−65
medium / 1080p	8−9	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Forza Horizon 4 is 277% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	4−5	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Minecraft is 27% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	65−70
medium / 768p	8−9	40−45
high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P600 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro P600
Architecture	Maxwell	Pascal
Code name	GM107	GP107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 November 2015	14 November 2017
Pipelines	512	384
Core clock speed	902 MHz	1430 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1620 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	37.37
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	1,117 gflops
Length	198 mm	145 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	64.13 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	5.0	6.1
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Quadro P600

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares