NVS 810 vs Radeon Pro 560X

When choosing between NVS 810 and Radeon Pro 560X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 810 and Radeon Pro 560X.

NVS 810 Check Price

Radeon Pro 560X Check Price

Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:

Radeon Pro 560X Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Radeon Pro 560X
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon Pro 560X has 10% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 560X has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 5 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 3280 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	30−33
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	6−7	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 810 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	220−230
medium / 768p	95−100	190−200
ultra / 1080p	40−45	110−120
QHD / 1440p	21−24	80−85
4K / 2160p	16−18	40−45
high / 768p	65−70	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	100−110
ultra / 1080p	21−24	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 98% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	2−3	7−8
low / 720p	10−12	45−50
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−33
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	10−12	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 212% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	3−4	12−14
4K / 2160p	2−3	12−14
low / 720p	18−20	65−70
medium / 1080p	8−9	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	100−105
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	4−5	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 27% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	65−70
medium / 768p	8−9	40−45
high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 61% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Radeon Pro 560X
Architecture	Maxwell	Polaris
Code name	GM107	Polaris 21
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	4 November 2015	5 June 2017
Pipelines	512	1024
Core clock speed	902 MHz	907 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	64.26
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops
Length	198 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	81.28 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	5.0
FreeSync		+
Laptop size		large
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Radeon Pro 560X

Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares