NVS 810 vs Radeon R7 250

In this comparison between NVS 810 and Radeon R7 250 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 250 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 810 Check Price

Radeon R7 250 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	N/A
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 250 has 10% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
NVS 810 and Radeon R7 250 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
NVS 810 and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
NVS 810 is 30 mm longer, than Radeon R7 250.
Memory clock speed of NVS 810 is 650 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	3−4
ultra / 1080p	1−2	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	14−16
medium / 1080p	4−5	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	5−6	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	18−20
medium / 1080p	6−7	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 810 and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	95−100	90−95
ultra / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	21−24	24−27
4K / 2160p	16−18	−
high / 768p	65−70	65−70
NVS 810 and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	80−85	80−85
medium / 768p	45−50	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	4−5
ultra / 1080p	2−3	4−5
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	10−12	14−16
medium / 1080p	4−5	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	10−12
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
QHD / 1440p	4−5	1−2
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	10−12	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Fortnite is 6% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	3−4	3−4
4K / 2160p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	18−20	21−24
medium / 1080p	8−9	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	4−5	8−9
ultra / 1080p	2−3	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	2−3
ultra / 1080p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	4−5	9−10
medium / 1080p	3−4	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
high / 1080p	80−85	85−90
ultra / 1080p	70−75	80−85
medium / 1080p	85−90	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Minecraft is 6% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
NVS 810 and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	7−8
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	18−20
medium / 768p	8−9	12−14
high / 1080p	4−5	6−7
ultra / 1080p	4−5	4−5
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	70−75
medium / 768p	35−40	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
high / 768p	30−35	30−35
NVS 810 and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Radeon R7 250
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN
Code name	GM107	Oland XT
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	4 November 2015	1 October 2013
Pipelines	512	384
Core clock speed	902 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1050 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	25.20
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	716.8 gflops
Length	198 mm	168 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		117 Mh/s
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Radeon R7 250

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares