NVS 810 vs Radeon R7 260X

In this comparison between NVS 810 and Radeon R7 260X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 810 Check Price

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260X has 69% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R7 260X has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
NVS 810 and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
NVS 810 is 28 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	1−2	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	4−5	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	50−55
medium / 1080p	6−7	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p	120−130	210−220
medium / 768p	95−100	180−190
ultra / 1080p	40−45	100−110
QHD / 1440p	21−24	55−60
4K / 2160p	16−18	30−35
high / 768p	65−70	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	95−100
ultra / 1080p	21−24	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 86% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	6−7
low / 720p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	20−22
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	10−12	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 181% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	10−11
4K / 2160p	2−3	10−11
low / 720p	18−20	55−60
medium / 1080p	8−9	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	4−5	30−35
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	10−11
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	4−5	30−35
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 22% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	30−33
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 416% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	55−60
medium / 768p	8−9	35−40
high / 1080p	4−5	20−22
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 440% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 2.0
Code name	GM107	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	4 November 2015	8 October 2013
Pipelines	512	896
Core clock speed	902 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1000 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	61.60
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length	198 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		225 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Radeon R7 260X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares