NVS 810 vs Radeon R9 A375

In this comparison between NVS 810 and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375

Main Specs

  NVS 810 Radeon R9 A375
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 8x mini-DisplayPort No outputs
  Check Price
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • NVS 810 and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
  • Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 2 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
  • NVS 810 and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of NVS 810 is 1796 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 2−3 2−3
ultra / 1080p 1−2 1−2
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 12−14 12−14
medium / 1080p 4−5 4−5
NVS 810 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.

Full Specs

  NVS 810 Radeon R9 A375
Architecture Maxwell GCN 1.0
Code name GM107 Venus
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 4 November 2015 no data
Pipelines 512 640
Core clock speed 902 MHz 900 MHz
Boost Clock 1033 MHz 925 MHz
Transistor count 1,870 million 1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 33.06 37.00
Floating-point performance 2x 1,058 gflops
Length 198 mm
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB/s 72 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_1)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2
CUDA 5.0
  Check Price