NVS 810 vs Tesla C2075
When choosing between NVS 810 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 810 and Tesla C2075.
Main Specs
NVS 810
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
8x mini-DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 263% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 328 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
NVS 810 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 50 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1332 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 320% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
21−24
65−70
4K / 2160p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 106% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
2−3
6−7
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
10−12
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 200% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
5−6
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−11
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
4−5
30−35
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
4−5
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
85−90
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 27% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
10−11
60−65
medium / 768p
8−9
35−40
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
NVS 810
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GM107
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
4 November 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
512
448
Core clock speed
902 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
33.06
32.14
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
198 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
5.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
