NVS 810 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between NVS 810 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the NVS 810 stacks up against Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, check out specs charts below.
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
NVS 810
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
NVS 810 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
NVS 810 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
1−2
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
30−33
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
120−130
200−210
medium / 768p
95−100
170−180
ultra / 1080p
40−45
90−95
QHD / 1440p
21−24
50−55
4K / 2160p
16−18
24−27
high / 768p
65−70
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
90−95
ultra / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
2−3
5−6
low / 720p
10−12
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
95−100
medium / 1080p
10−12
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 150% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
4−5
27−30
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
27−30
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 433% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
100−110
medium / 1080p
85−90
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 28% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
10−11
50−55
medium / 768p
8−9
30−35
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
NVS 810
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
GM107
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
4 November 2015
15 August 2020
Pipelines
512
96
Core clock speed
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
33.06
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
